[Rambit]

I'm not really interested in stirring up a hornets nest over this, however, although your comments are correct, they are somewhat misleading. People should be aware of an important fact. While reading a post on another issue, I came across a statement that is a real eye opener. In his post he was referring to using a non-recommended oil viscosity, but it applies to all modifications..."DC has to prove nothing to deny the claim, they do have to prove the "modification" caused the failure in court only after you have spent countless thousands of dollars and hours getting them to court in the first place." The poster went on to say, who has pockets deep enough to take DC to court and "PROVE" that it did not cause the problem.

Those wishing to do mods should also understand that it's not as cut and dry as it seems. It's one thing to say "I know my rights", but having the money and the years it would take to prove you're right is another story. You can list all the government links you wish. All DC has to do is say no and you have no option but to take them to court over it. That's what corporate lawyers get paid to do. Remember, they only have to prove it once you finally get them into a court room.

Rambit