Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hot Black Hemi
Sorry Spock1, only just had a chance to catch up with this thread this morning. The claims originally come off the K&N web page - 21HP (15kw). I also spoke with C&V Performance (Con) up here in Sydney that ran a dyno test on a car that had the Hitech exhaust fitted (cats back) plus the K&N aircharger unit and they said that the before and after dyno runs realised a gain of around 32kw so the numbers seem to line up.
I have not run mine yet as I am waiting on the Superchip to do the whole lot in one session. I can tell you that the car has become alot more responsive since fitting both the exhaust and aircharger unit on.
On a side issues, I have also been in discussion with suppliers of Headers and they are telling me that none have been developed so far in Oz but a fear they have is that they might make no dfference to the car's performance and may in fact have a negative effect. A couple of the guys believe that the greatest power gains are to be had from the cats back..
I am also told that one of our Forum guys (Demon??) has fitted a Throttle Body spacer from "Crusin on" with good results?? have ordered one and will advise how I go once it's fitted!!
|
Thanks for getting back to me HBH. A 32kw gain is pretty damn impressive. You'd certainly be able to feel that through the seat. I'm alway very sceptical about power figures quoted by manufactureres for air intakes on naturally aspirated cars.
The test carried out by a U.S forum member revealled either a miniscule improvement or none at all.
The throttle body spacer is another product that has been debunked by a lot of our U.S colleagues.
I fear that people install these kinds of devices and mistakenly believe that they can feel an inprovement because they want to so much. They don't go to the trouble of actually measuring the before and after performance figures and just go by seat of the pants feel or worse still, more aggressive sound. I seriously considered the TBS but after reading the responses on the U.S forum I quickly changed my mind. I feel that unless there is a majority consensus on a product from end users or actual positve test results that these kinds of products are best treated as dubious.
Odd news about the headers. I would never have predicted a decline in performance. What's their reasoning ?
Cheers
Sean