Check Out This 300 I found

[YungKolyon]

Check Out this base model 300 I found, looks good, huh?

[Redman]

Well done.
Creeping into RR's turf however.
Just needs a waterfall grill, eh?

[II kings 9:20]

Reminds me of a great tv show in the late 70s early 80s....... TAXI (theme music by jazz great Bob James)

[lavalamp]

May have to add some silver to my lava red...

[Lik2race]

Originally Posted by lavalamp

May have to add some silver to my lava red...

Hee hee...was kinda thinking the same thing..would look real nice too.

[Soju Lizard]

I didn't like it at first but it sort of grows on you the longer you look at it. Definately a head turner. I like the wheels too.

[jjs]

At least they didn't screw up a C doing that stuff. Wheels have to go, the hood...yuck, and the roof painted looks like a horrible vinyl top from a distance.

Other than that, nice...

[yarbie]

Terrible ! Really starting to see some gawdy looking 300's. Less is more in my book.
It's not bad but still it's on a base 300. I am really dissapointed in Chrysler for even making
a $23,000 "300". All you see is the base 300's running around with rims and add on chrome pieces everywhere. Mercedes doesn't make a cheap version of the SL500 you get an SL500. My point is you just don't
make a car that looks as good as the 300 and not have it be a "C". You have to have
the Hemi, the leather and all the trimming's that the "C" has on it stock. They should have made different versions of the "C" and left out these crappy, cheap versions of
this car, plain and simple. You don't want to pull of next to someone in a base model
300 even with 22's on it. Especially if you pull up next to a "C" with a Hemi on 22's.


They should have never made a chimsy version of the 300 but they did and that's what I don't get.

[Angi300C]

YungKolyon, that 300 does look good. Thanks for the pics!

[Jamesw]

Originally Posted by yarbie

Terrible ! Really starting to see some gawdy looking 300's. Less is more in my book.
It's not bad but still it's on a base 300. I am really dissapointed in Chrysler for even making
a $23,000 "300". All you see is the base 300's running around with rims and add on chrome pieces everywhere. Mercedes doesn't make a cheap version of the SL500 you get an SL500. My point is you just don't
make a car that looks as good as the 300 and not have it be a "C". You have to have
the Hemi, the leather and all the trimming's that the "C" has on it stock. They should have made different versions of the "C" and left out these crappy, cheap versions of
this car, plain and simple. You don't want to pull of next to someone in a base model
300 even with 22's on it. Especially if you pull up next to a "C" with a Hemi on 22's.


They should have never made a chimsy version of the 300 but they did and that's what I don't get.

Ok people like you should not speak unless spoken to, you are a complete waste of space and have no valid points to base that opinion off of. Myself yes I drive a base model however I am only 20 and thats all i could afford. You want to compare a Mb to a Mb try this on. Why would they make a Sl500 its cheaper than the Sl65amg. So why wouldnt they make all SL's a Sl65AMG. Because some people cant afford it or do not want to spend that much on a car. By making statements like that you are going to give everyone that owns a 300 a bad name. I can even begin to imagine how stupid you are outside the internet. Its a great surprise to me you can figure out how to log on to this site. So for now until you can say something with a little smarts involved please do use "Base Model Drivers" a favor and shut the hell up.

Thanks,
James