Review and Ratings of 2007 300 Series

[LeeSoFL]

Interesting reading:

http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/N.../Act/Roadtest/

[dj619gior]

Originally Posted by LeeSoFL

Interesting reading:

http://auto.consumerguide.com/Auto/N.../Act/Roadtest/

Good find. Thank you I enjoyed reading that.

[CVC22348(b)(1)]

Pretty cool and very close to my experiences between the srt8 and the "regular" C.

[srt8danno]

Interesting article. Having owned both 5.7 and 6.1 I would say they’re pretty close on the difference. Thanks for sharing.

[FirstChrysler]

Interesting cursory review. But if you notice, its the same review as the 2006 model. I doubt they actually rode in a 2007 (perhaps not even the 2006).

[rickgonz]

Originally Posted by FirstChrysler

Interesting cursory review. But if you notice, its the same review as the 2006 model. I doubt they actually rode in a 2007 (perhaps not even the 2006).

I agree. these guys are more about publishing magazines than reviewing cars. Both the consumers guide and consumer reports are only half reliable. At the same time consumer reports was calling the Thunderbird coupe "slab sided", it was raving about the toyota Camry. The morons also for three straight years said the engine in the Concorde was "transverse", when anyone who actually popped the hood on a Concorde/LHS/300M/Intrepid knew the engine was longitudinal. All these guys have a predisposed bias against American cars anyway, and think the sun shines out of German and Japanese a**es. They say a few good things about the acceleration and price, but most of the reviews are an attempt to place the 300 in the middle rating range.