Thank You Dear Friends!

[srt8danno]

Originally Posted by MrHappy

Not if they're smashed in your face!

You do have a point there...........plus 100 for Mr. H!!

[DUBSTER]

Originally Posted by MrHappy

Not if they're smashed in your face!

SEWEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!!!!!!!!!

[DUBSTER]

Originally Posted by MrHappy

Not if they're smashed in your face!

These would make you "mr. really happy"

[srt8danno]

In a futile attempt at bringing this train wreck of a thread back on topic, while maintaining a disgusting level of male vulgarity I’ve done some research of net lore when it comes to boobs. So here you go.

Mind you there is nothing funny about Breast Cancer as I have relatives who are survivors (thank God my Grandmother, Mom & Sister), but here is a falsehood that circulates around the internet….who do you think started it? You’ve got to love the names of the researchers.

Study: Fellatio may significantly decrease the risk of breast cancer in women
Thursday, October 2, 2003 Posted: 9:19 AM EDT (1319 GMT)
(AP) -- Women who perform the act of fellatio on a regular basis, one to two times a week, may reduce their risk of breast cancer by up to 40 percent, a North Carolina State University study found.

Doctors had never suspected a link between the act of fellatio and breast cancer, but new research being performed at North Carolina State University is starting to suggest that there could be an important link between the two.

In a study of over 15,000 women suspected of having performed regular fellatio over the past ten years, the researchers found that those actually having performed the act regularly, one to two times a week, had a lower occurrence of breast cancer than those who had not. There was no increased risk, however, for those who did not regularly perform.

"I think it removes the last shade of doubt that fellatio is actually a healthy act," said Dr. B.J. Sooner of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, who was not involved in the research. "I am surprised by these findings, but am also excited that the researchers may have discovered a relatively easy way to lower the occurrence of breast cancer in women."

The University researchers stressed that, though breast cancer is relatively uncommon, any steps taken to reduce the risk would be a wise decision.

"Only with regular performance will your chances be reduced, so I encourage all women out there to make fellatio an important part of their daily routine," said Dr. Inserta Shafteer, one of the researchers at the University. "Since the emergence of the research, I try to fellate at least once every other night to reduce my chances."

The study is reported in Friday's Journal of Medical Research.


Dr. Len Lictepeen, deputy chief medical officer for the American Cancer Society, said women should not overlook or "play down" these findings.

"This will hopefully change women's practice and patterns, resulting in a severe drop in the future number of cases," Lictepeen said.

Sooner said the research shows no increase in the risk of breast cancer in those who are, for whatever reason, not able to fellate regularly.

"There's definitely fertile ground for more research. Many have stepped forward to volunteer for related research now in the planning stages," he said.

Almost every woman is, at some point, going to perform the act of fellatio, but it is the frequency at which this event occurs that makes the difference, say researchers.

The research consisted of two groups, 6,246 women ages 25 to 45 who had performed fellatio on a regular basis over the past five to ten years, and 9,728 women who had not. The group of women who had performed fellatio had a breast cancer rate of 1.9 percent and the group who had not had a breast cancer rate of 10.4 percent.

"The findings do suggest that there are other causes for breast cancer besides the absence of regular fellatio," Shafteer said. "It's a cause, not THE cause."

[srt8danno]

Here is another one we would love to believe is true. In fact it might be the reason why we love to post so many boob pictures. This article was never published in the New England Journal of Medicine



Great news for girl watchers: Ogling over women's breasts is good for a man's health and can add years to his life, medical experts have discovered. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, "Just 10 minutes of staring at the charms of a well-endowed female is roughly equivalent to a 30-minute aerobics work-out" declared gerontologist Dr. Karen Weatherby.

Dr. Weatherby and fellow researchers at three hospitals in Frankfurt, Germany, reached the startling conclusion after comparing the health of 200 male outpatients - half of whom were instructed to look at busty females daily, the other half told to refrain from doing so. The study revealed that after five years, the chest-watchers had lower blood pressure, slower resting pulse rates and fewer instances of coronary artery disease.

"Sexual excitement gets the heart pumping and improves blood circulation," explains Dr. Weatherby. "There's no question: Gazing at breasts makes men healthier." "Our study indicates that engaging in this activity a few minutes daily cuts the risk of stroke and heart attack in half. We believe that by doing so consistently, the average man can extend his life four to five years."

[DUBSTER]

Originally Posted by srt8danno

In a futile attempt at bringing this train wreck of a thread back on topic, while maintaining a disgusting level of male vulgarity I’ve done some research of net lore when it comes to boobs. So here you go.

Mind you there is nothing funny about Breast Cancer as I have relatives who are survivors (thank God my Grandmother, Mom & Sister), but here is a falsehood that circulates around the internet….who do you think started it? You’ve got to love the names of the researchers.

Study: Fellatio may significantly decrease the risk of breast cancer in women
Thursday, October 2, 2003 Posted: 9:19 AM EDT (1319 GMT)
(AP) -- Women who perform the act of fellatio on a regular basis, one to two times a week, may reduce their risk of breast cancer by up to 40 percent, a North Carolina State University study found.

Doctors had never suspected a link between the act of fellatio and breast cancer, but new research being performed at North Carolina State University is starting to suggest that there could be an important link between the two.

In a study of over 15,000 women suspected of having performed regular fellatio over the past ten years, the researchers found that those actually having performed the act regularly, one to two times a week, had a lower occurrence of breast cancer than those who had not. There was no increased risk, however, for those who did not regularly perform.

"I think it removes the last shade of doubt that fellatio is actually a healthy act," said Dr. B.J. Sooner of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, who was not involved in the research. "I am surprised by these findings, but am also excited that the researchers may have discovered a relatively easy way to lower the occurrence of breast cancer in women."

The University researchers stressed that, though breast cancer is relatively uncommon, any steps taken to reduce the risk would be a wise decision.

"Only with regular performance will your chances be reduced, so I encourage all women out there to make fellatio an important part of their daily routine," said Dr. Inserta Shafteer, one of the researchers at the University. "Since the emergence of the research, I try to fellate at least once every other night to reduce my chances."

The study is reported in Friday's Journal of Medical Research.


Dr. Len Lictepeen, deputy chief medical officer for the American Cancer Society, said women should not overlook or "play down" these findings.

"This will hopefully change women's practice and patterns, resulting in a severe drop in the future number of cases," Lictepeen said.

Sooner said the research shows no increase in the risk of breast cancer in those who are, for whatever reason, not able to fellate regularly.

"There's definitely fertile ground for more research. Many have stepped forward to volunteer for related research now in the planning stages," he said.

Almost every woman is, at some point, going to perform the act of fellatio, but it is the frequency at which this event occurs that makes the difference, say researchers.

The research consisted of two groups, 6,246 women ages 25 to 45 who had performed fellatio on a regular basis over the past five to ten years, and 9,728 women who had not. The group of women who had performed fellatio had a breast cancer rate of 1.9 percent and the group who had not had a breast cancer rate of 10.4 percent.

"The findings do suggest that there are other causes for breast cancer besides the absence of regular fellatio," Shafteer said. "It's a cause, not THE cause."

That is hillarious!!

[srt8danno]

Is it true that Jennifer Lopez insured her butt?

Dear Reader:

Thereby hangs a tale, so please bear with me.

With the possible exception of that work in progress known as Michael Jackson's face, no celebrity body part in recent memory has achieved greater prominence than J. Lo's derriere. It is enthroned as an object of veneration on fan Websites. It inspired a new trend in below-the-waist surgical implants. Gossip columnists have worn out thesauri hunting down superlatives to describe it ("ample," "deluxe," "abundant," "big"). Salon magazine devoted an entire essay to its cultural significance.

There's no getting around it, Jennifer Lopez's personal fame has very nearly been eclipsed by that of her own behind.

Nor is there any getting around rampant rumors of a comparably deluxe insurance policy.

In 1999, tabloids on both sides of the Atlantic — The Sun in London and the New York Post — ran articles claiming that Jennifer Lopez had indemnified her body (her entire body, please note) to the tune of $1 billion. Even though pound-for-pound the singer's boobs fetched a more generous appraisal than her hiney ($100 million per breast vs. $300 million for legs and buttocks combined, according to the Post), word on the street soon had it that the "abundant butt" alone was valued at a cool billion.

Lopez denies it. I think.

"I don't know where they got it from," she said to reporters when questioned about the tabloid allegations. "When I heard the story I thought it was very funny."

Her agent's response was even more vague: "At this time we cannot confirm or deny this information."

A more flaccid pair of denials I have never read, yet they ran under headlines like "Lopez: I'm No Billion Dollar Babe" on BBC News and elsewhere, so we're obliged to conclude — a posteriori, as it were — that someone at some point must have actually uttered the words "It's not true" in front of a journalist.

Either that, or in Lopez-speak "funny" is synonymous with "false."

The closest to a straightforward disavowal I've found in print appeared in an August 2000 interview with BeatBoxBetty.com in which Lopez was asked to name the "wildest rumors" she had heard about herself.

"The craziest," she said, "was the Billion Dollar Butt one. It was on the front page of the paper, here in New York. I happened to be in New York that week. It was funny."

"So you haven't insured your body?" pressed the interviewer.

"I think that's what I'm trying to say here," Lopez replied.

Draw your own conclusion.

[DUBSTER]

Originally Posted by srt8danno

Is it true that Jennifer Lopez insured her butt?

Dear Reader:

Thereby hangs a tale, so please bear with me.

With the possible exception of that work in progress known as Michael Jackson's face, no celebrity body part in recent memory has achieved greater prominence than J. Lo's derriere. It is enthroned as an object of veneration on fan Websites. It inspired a new trend in below-the-waist surgical implants. Gossip columnists have worn out thesauri hunting down superlatives to describe it ("ample," "deluxe," "abundant," "big"). Salon magazine devoted an entire essay to its cultural significance.

There's no getting around it, Jennifer Lopez's personal fame has very nearly been eclipsed by that of her own behind.

Nor is there any getting around rampant rumors of a comparably deluxe insurance policy.

In 1999, tabloids on both sides of the Atlantic — The Sun in London and the New York Post — ran articles claiming that Jennifer Lopez had indemnified her body (her entire body, please note) to the tune of $1 billion. Even though pound-for-pound the singer's boobs fetched a more generous appraisal than her hiney ($100 million per breast vs. $300 million for legs and buttocks combined, according to the Post), word on the street soon had it that the "abundant butt" alone was valued at a cool billion.

Lopez denies it. I think.

"I don't know where they got it from," she said to reporters when questioned about the tabloid allegations. "When I heard the story I thought it was very funny."

Her agent's response was even more vague: "At this time we cannot confirm or deny this information."

A more flaccid pair of denials I have never read, yet they ran under headlines like "Lopez: I'm No Billion Dollar Babe" on BBC News and elsewhere, so we're obliged to conclude — a posteriori, as it were — that someone at some point must have actually uttered the words "It's not true" in front of a journalist.

Either that, or in Lopez-speak "funny" is synonymous with "false."

The closest to a straightforward disavowal I've found in print appeared in an August 2000 interview with BeatBoxBetty.com in which Lopez was asked to name the "wildest rumors" she had heard about herself.

"The craziest," she said, "was the Billion Dollar Butt one. It was on the front page of the paper, here in New York. I happened to be in New York that week. It was funny."

"So you haven't insured your body?" pressed the interviewer.

"I think that's what I'm trying to say here," Lopez replied.

Draw your own conclusion.

LOL!! I heard about that too!!! Her deductable was HUUUUUGE!!!!!!

[SRT808]

10/01/1985-Justin. 21