Interested in the Dodge Challenger? Be sure to check out the Dodge Challenger Forum for your Dodge Challenger information!
Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Header Left Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Logo Right

Go Back   Chrysler 300C & SRT8 Forum > SRT8 Forums > SRT8-Specific General Discussion
Home Forum Active Topics (T) Photo Gallery Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2004, 12:34 PM   #21 (permalink)
Supporting Vendor
 
DZeckhausen's Avatar
Premium User
 
Car: 2006 All options 300C SRT8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member Number: 1056
Location: Fairfield, NJ
Trader Rating: (9)
Posts: 1,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by davequick
Other than convention - what is the main purpose that 3 or 9 is optimal?
It minimizes the impact of wheel bearing deflection on the calipers. In other words, a caliper at 12:00 is more likely to suffer from pad knockback than a caliper at 3:00 following a series of turns with high lateral loads. See: http://www.stoptech.com/whitepapers/knockback.htm
__________________
Dave Zeckhausen
Owner, Zeckhausen Racing

SRT8 Products: 300C, Charger, Magnum
Chrysler 300 Products
Dodge Magnum Products
Dodge Charger Products
DZeckhausen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-18-2004, 02:43 PM   #22 (permalink)
Supporting Vendor
 
DZeckhausen's Avatar
Premium User
 
Car: 2006 All options 300C SRT8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member Number: 1056
Location: Fairfield, NJ
Trader Rating: (9)
Posts: 1,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by DZeckhausen
I realize you're teasing me. But to clarify. I said the SRT8 rear caliper is approximatly in the same location (perhaps 15 degrees CCW) of the 300C rear caliper. I didn't say that EITHER caliper was in the ideal 3:00 or 9:00 position.

I'm putting the rear StopTech brake kit on my 300C right after I eat lunch. I'll take some photos to see if it's obvious why they oriented the calipers the way they did.
Well, I now understand why the SRT-8 and the "ordinary" 300C have the rear calipers located in the leading position. If they were clocked to the trailing position, they would interfere with the lower control arm as well as the end link for the rear swaybar. This photo should make it more clear. This is the right rear corner of my car:

DZeckhausen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 02:45 PM   #23 (permalink)
Supporting Vendor
 
DZeckhausen's Avatar
Premium User
 
Car: 2006 All options 300C SRT8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member Number: 1056
Location: Fairfield, NJ
Trader Rating: (9)
Posts: 1,095
The rest of the photos may be found in the Brake forum at the following thread: http://300cforums.com/showthread.php?t=2092&page=3
DZeckhausen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 12:03 AM   #24 (permalink)
Member
 
davequick's Avatar
 
Car:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member Number: 1018
Location: Redmond, WA
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by DZeckhausen
It minimizes the impact of wheel bearing deflection on the calipers. In other words, a caliper at 12:00 is more likely to suffer from pad knockback than a caliper at 3:00 following a series of turns with high lateral loads. See: http://www.stoptech.com/whitepapers/knockback.htm
Thanks for the pointer to an explination.

It makses sense to me on race cars but not production cars, but I'm not involved with a racing effort personally and have less than zero actual wrench time myself...

Thinking throug the problem of braking during cornering which seems to be the only time that wheel bearing deflection would occur based on the sketches at the URL you provide - if you were within proper tolerance for alignment on your caliper and pad setup) the car (i'm thinking SRT8 standard with ESP) will sense out of proportion wheelspin for input steering control and pulse that brake due to the Bosch 8.0 software inthe brake controller - the pulsing is equivalent to letting off the brake and reapplying 150 times per second. At least if the ESP is equivalent to the current Mercedes parts bin in 2005 Mercedes cars. Even with ESP "deactivated" it is stil on - just at about 20% the effectiveness as when it is fully active, again - if equivalent to current ESP in Mercedes.

Does this type of electrronic intervention help mitigate the conventional wisdom of 3 o'clock on a road going car with a brain? I mean obviously most race classes likley ban this type of electronics and I can see the 3 o'clock as a necessity for them... but what's your opinion - does the electronic smarts in a modern car like an SRT8 with ESP negate the concern of piston knockback for fixed caliper setups?

Thanks in advance for the education. :-)

-dq
davequick is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 07:04 AM   #25 (permalink)
Supporting Vendor
 
DZeckhausen's Avatar
Premium User
 
Car: 2006 All options 300C SRT8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member Number: 1056
Location: Fairfield, NJ
Trader Rating: (9)
Posts: 1,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by davequick
Does this type of electrronic intervention help mitigate the conventional wisdom of 3 o'clock on a road going car with a brain? I mean obviously most race classes likley ban this type of electronics and I can see the 3 o'clock as a necessity for them... but what's your opinion - does the electronic smarts in a modern car like an SRT8 with ESP negate the concern of piston knockback for fixed caliper setups?
Typically, one would disable this type of electronic intervention when tracking a car. Otherwise, the conservative software would be cutting power to the engine and reducing slip angles to the point that your lap times would be seriously compromised.

Keep in mind that this knockback issue ONLY occurs when you put sticky tires on the car and drive VERY hard on the race track. That's when weakness of the wheel bearing design becomes apparent. This is not something that is going to happen on the street.
DZeckhausen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 12:15 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
indyCoder's Avatar
 
Car:
Join Date: May 2004
Member Number: 157
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 442
Man those ST look good. I've had 22's for about 4,000 miles, no problems. I’m with you on upping the brake. I have to decide if I’m keeping the C or getting an SRT.
__________________
Philip Smith

2005 Ram SRT-10
Bright Silver
Every option except UConnect
Currently Stock

2005 300C
Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl
Every option except smokers group and block heater
K & N
FlowMaster Exhaust
17% Tent
DVS 785 265/35/22
2 12" Subs with 1200 Watts

2005 Pacifica Limited AWD
Linen Gold Metallic Pearl Coat

** The 2005 300C is for sale (see above info)
indyCoder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 PM.

  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0