**2008 Challenger Hi Res Pics Hot Off The Press!**

[Rambit]

You can clearly see the rear glass DOES NOT go down!

Bernie

[bruno]

Rambit,
Orange you nice for posting all those high resolution photos of an exciting exterior with an extremely boring, bland interior!

Now, where is that concept car that had all the good looks and goodies??????

bruno

[Rambit]

Originally Posted by bruno

Rambit,
Orange you nice for posting all those high resolution photos of an exciting exterior with an extremely boring, bland interior!

Now, where is that concept car that had all the good looks and goodies??????

bruno

Hemi Addict said it best yesterday, "we don't drive our interiors", or words to that effect. This car is all about the outside IMO, and to say "hey, look at me, aren't I something eh". As far as I'm concerned a true lover of this car couldn't care less if there were wires strewn all over the inside of it.

Am I making any sense? Don't you dare answer that!!!

Bernie

[Rambit]

Humm. Lots of guests here I see! Must be because I posted the link at Challenger forums...haha. Welcome everyone!!!

Bernie

[TTP]

Thanks for posting those photo's Bernie!
Any idea on the first year production runs? Both USA and CDN.

[Rambit]

Originally Posted by TTP

Thanks for posting those photo's Bernie!
Any idea on the first year production runs? Both USA and CDN.

Don't take this for Gospel, but I thought I heard Bob Nardelli say during the web cast it was about 6,300 when he referred to the numbered plaques.

Bernie

[Someguys300c]

well the outside of it looks good. but those pics definately put to rest any idea i had of trading my SRT 300 for a chalenger. interior looks virtually identical, and it has the same engine. im sure it has a few more horses. but nothing i cant massage out of my 300 with a few mods. i figured with the challenger being 2 less doors. that you would see some better times out of it, due to the decrease in weight. those times barely look any better than the current SRT's.

[floored]

Anyone notice the mistake in one of the pictures? That is not a 1970 Challanger. It is a 72 or later. Side markers are a dead give away. Also the ugly huge bumper guards. I see that everyone has a differnt opinion on how it looks. I tend to like it. Sure, the interior looks like ours but I wasn't expecting it to be that much different. I had the pleasure of owning a 1970 and will purchase a new one. Just will wait until the hype is over so I don't pay the 10 to 20 g's over the sticker price. And I want the speeder.

[bruno]

Originally Posted by Rambit

Hemi Addict said it best yesterday, "we don't drive our interiors", or words to that effect. This car is all about the outside IMO, and to say "hey, look at me, aren't I something eh". As far as I'm concerned a true lover of this car couldn't care less if there were wires strewn all over the inside of it.

Am I making any sense? Don't you dare answer that!!!

Bernie

The interior styling/design of an expensive vehicle definitely needs to impress ME! You might as well rip out everything from your SRT's interior other than your driver seat if you believe those words.

Don't worry! I won't reply to your making sense question.

[Rambit]

Originally Posted by bruno

The interior styling/design of an expensive vehicle definitely needs to impress ME! You might as well rip out everything from your SRT's interior other than your driver seat if you believe those words.

Don't worry! I won't reply to your making sense question.

I don't think you can really describe our cars as all that expensive. Hey, look at the Viper ACR. They have a Hard Core package where they take all that crap out and you get to pay more for it. You must not remember rubber mats and sparce interiors in the Belvedere's and such, but I bet you remember the 426 hemi though. All those hot muscle cars started out as econo boxes.

Bernie