Interested in the Dodge Challenger? Be sure to check out the Dodge Challenger Forum for your Dodge Challenger information!
Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Header Left Chrysler 300C SRT-8 Logo Right

Go Back   Chrysler 300C & SRT8 Forum > SRT8 Forums > SRT8-Specific Performance & Engine/Intake/Exhaust Mods
Home Forum Active Topics (T) Photo Gallery Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2007, 10:07 AM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Double's Avatar
 
Car: 2006 Chrysler 300C SRT-8
Join Date: Oct 2006
Member Number: 8649
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambit View Post
That's the only way they would do it as it's SOP for a dyno run. What the difference is it's not real world HP gains. In other words you wouldn't be running at the track with your hood open and a big fan in front of you.

Rambit
But it is the same conditions for the Car, I would say that you can deduce that the HP gains are the same percentage wise with the hood up or down.
Double is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-21-2007, 10:22 AM   #22 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Rambit's Avatar
Premium User
 
Car: 2005 300C SRT8
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member Number: 1493
Location: Why I'm at www.300cforums.com of course!
Trader Rating: (5)
Posts: 14,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double View Post
But it is the same conditions for the Car, I would say that you can deduce that the HP gains are the same percentage wise with the hood up or down.
I suppose the difference being is that you've eliminated the cold air factor. It's no longer sucking up cold air. It's also the same as what the engineers said in the post I linked to in post #1... "We have found transient dynos to be somewhat innacurate. All of our testing is done at Steady State and corrected to standard conditions."

Rambit
__________________
Check out our 300Cforums online Store. Go --->HERE




2005 300C SRT8 - #72 of 252 (excl. 11 pilots) - #10 of 35 Canadian SRT8's built
2008 Harley Davidson FLSTF Fatboy - Vance & Hines Big Shots STGD with FuelPak tune.
2008 Jeep GC SRT8 - Custom Build/Custom Delivered by SRT - 1 of 1 in Canada
Rambit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 11:27 AM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tork Monster's Avatar
 
Car: 2006 Chrysler 300C SRT-8
Join Date: Jun 2006
Member Number: 6292
Location: Seattle, WA
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double View Post
But it is the same conditions for the Car, I would say that you can deduce that the HP gains are the same percentage wise with the hood up or down.
Testing a stock intake against a K&N intake with the hood up will bias the test towards the K&N. This would allow the K&N to draw cold air from the open hood, while the stock intake will still have to draw from the more restrictive pathway from down below.

I was suggesting that possibly K&N's testing could have been set up to purposely give a great advantage to their intake. I can't otherwise understand how they could get such high HP gains.

Maybe they positioned a high-speed fan over the intake during the test. This could slightly force-feed the K&N but would not affect the stock intake as it is closed on top. The test could also have been made with a heat-soaked engine on the stock intake and with a cool engine with the K&N (the dyno chart shows a teat time of 8:30 AM for the stock intake and 9:52 for the K&N. The test car could have been running open headers for all we can tell.

These are a bit far-fetched, I realize, but how else can you explain how they got such great gains? 21.09 HP? I can't believe they forged the dyno chart.
__________________
just kruzin' . . . . . Jay

Last edited by Tork Monster : 01-21-2007 at 12:44 PM.
Tork Monster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 12:17 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
caligezzer's Avatar
 
Car: 2006 Silver 300C SRT8
Join Date: Nov 2005
Member Number: 4104
Location: Huntington Beach
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 250
Send a message via MSN to caligezzer
Having built a number of turbo cars I’d say if you engine needs extra air then give it that air. It should how ever be in conjunction with an improved exhaust.

However on the stock SRT8 with no turbo or supercharger I go no further than an improved air filter. I ran a stock filter and a K&N filter back to back on the dyno and got about 9bhp across the band but no increase at top end. This to me is an excellent gain for 40 bucks. I have seen 20 – 30bhp gains but at what price.

All I ever hear is top end and as you car only spends micro seconds at that point in the power band it probably make little difference, especially if it’s at the deficit of the over all band.

One system I would consider is the GSM system. Anyone got some numbers on that one?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambit View Post
After the latest SRT Engineers Chat Session, I'm left with some doubt if any of the CAI's really do as they claim.

Basically what they're saying, in answer to ResumeSpeed's question, is that many of these are not really CAI's at all as they suck hot air in from behind the radiator along with dirt.

They also say the stock SRT8 airbox is better in that the pressure drop is the lowest at WOT they've ever tested. Add to that, they say 22 RWHP gains are not realistic.

Comments???

Dodge Charger Forums - View Single Post - Srt Q & A Session: 01-17-07

Rambit
__________________
CaliGezzer
caligezzer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 02:35 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tork Monster's Avatar
 
Car: 2006 Chrysler 300C SRT-8
Join Date: Jun 2006
Member Number: 6292
Location: Seattle, WA
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,340
K&N Air Charger

Here is why I am so interested in the K&N claims-
I just installed the K&N Air Charger on my 6.1

This is Will's old intake. He just installed an Air Hammer on his and made me a great deal on his old K&N because it was damaged.
Evidently it had worked loose at some time and rubbed against the pulley below it. That wore a large hole in the intake tube.

I cut it and sectioned it with a new section of ABS tube. The bands seen are the connecting couplings. The inside is smooth.

I haven't test driven it yet, as I want to install my Jet chip too, if weather holds out.

I bet this will be temporary until I step up to a Hammer.
Attached Thumbnails
srt8-cai-hp-gains-fact-fiction-k-n-intake.jpgN Intake.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	135.6 KB
ID:	19543  
Tork Monster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 03:49 PM   #26 (permalink)
Australia Forum Moderator
 
Hemi57's Avatar
Premium User
 
Car: 2006 (Australian Spec) Gone: 2005 300C HEMI 57 Bright Silver/Light Grey - Arrived 13 April: SRT 61 Bright Silver/Black w/light grey
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member Number: 299
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Trader Rating: (3)
Posts: 4,859
I have the Mopar CAI.

I am comfortable with the Mopar CAI as it is the same brand as my car and I therefore consider it to be engineered to a high quality with the car's durability and performance taken into the equation.

On the box Mopar claim an 8 - 10 HP gain.

I believe that with the right maintenance the Filter will protect my engine from drawing in contaminants which are harmful.

It looks good.

It sounds fabulous.

But does it give me improved performance? I don't really care.
__________________
John

SRT8 Mods:

E&G Heavy Mesh Grille
Tint
Ultimate Racing Pedals
22Elite Console Lid Leather Cover & 22Elite Arm Rests
C-TEKs
Shaved side moldings
Mopar CAI
"Fatt" Exhaust Tips
Hemi57 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 05:38 PM   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tork Monster's Avatar
 
Car: 2006 Chrysler 300C SRT-8
Join Date: Jun 2006
Member Number: 6292
Location: Seattle, WA
Trader Rating: (1)
Posts: 1,340
Well, I just did a short test drive with the new K&N Air CHarger and the Jet Stage II performance chip installed.



Have these two mods added anything?

All I can say is I am severely traction-limited in first now.

Tork Monster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 05:51 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Double's Avatar
 
Car: 2006 Chrysler 300C SRT-8
Join Date: Oct 2006
Member Number: 8649
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 197
Does all air entering that engine bay while driving come from the drivers side Air inlet under the headlight?
Double is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 06:01 PM   #29 (permalink)
Member
 
roadwing1's Avatar
 
Car: 2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8
Join Date: Feb 2006
Member Number: 4853
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Trader Rating: (0)
Posts: 67
Taking off my CAI...

After reading that response from the SRT guys, I have become less and less a lover of some of the mods I have put on my baby. I have been planning on pulling my CAI off tonight and putting back the stock unit. I am also tired of CELs going off from the hi-flow cats.

As it was stated earlier, all the mods come at a trade-off. Maybe more sound, maybe more speed, but now I have drone and noise and diagnostic errors.

I am beginning to think that i may just put the whole car back to the way it was. After all, that was the one I fell in love with.

Honestly, my car felt quicker back with all the stock stuff.
__________________
Roadwing1
----------
2006 Brilliant Black 300C SRT8
All Options except VES
Ordered 12/11/05, Built 1/10/06, took delivery 1/17/06
Jet Chip Stage 2
MagnaFlow Cats and Cat-back exhaust
Raybestos Pads
JET Powr Flo
Carbon Fiber Dash Kit
Ultimate Pedals w/SRT-8 logo
Custom Mats
roadwing1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 06:40 PM   #30 (permalink)
Australia Forum Moderator
 
Hemi57's Avatar
Premium User
 
Car: 2006 (Australian Spec) Gone: 2005 300C HEMI 57 Bright Silver/Light Grey - Arrived 13 April: SRT 61 Bright Silver/Black w/light grey
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member Number: 299
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Trader Rating: (3)
Posts: 4,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadwing1 View Post
After reading that response from the SRT guys, I have become less and less a lover of some of the mods I have put on my baby. I have been planning on pulling my CAI off tonight and putting back the stock unit. I am also tired of CELs going off from the hi-flow cats.

As it was stated earlier, all the mods come at a trade-off. Maybe more sound, maybe more speed, but now I have drone and noise and diagnostic errors.

I am beginning to think that i may just put the whole car back to the way it was. After all, that was the one I fell in love with.

Honestly, my car felt quicker back with all the stock stuff.
roadwing1, I applaud you for your stating your frank experiences. I am somewhat conservative myself with the performance mods I have done or would consider doing.

The owner of a new SRT8 up in Queensland was referred to call me as he was suffering power loss and error codes on his brand new car which had the Mopar CAI and cat back exhaust (I think the exhaust was Mopar ) fitted by the Chrysler dealer before he picked it up. He rang me to ask if I had heard of anyone else who had suffered problems and what the cause was, but I could not help him other to suggest what the dealer was already trying. The dealer was progressively returning the original items onto the SRT8 and trying to determine what the cause of the problem was by a process of elimination. I have had no contact with the guy since so don't know the final outcome.
Hemi57 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 AM.

  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.