Clean300 said:
Thanks for the response.
I am already sold on a brake upgrade, that's for sure.
Just not sure which one.
I was more looking for a comaprrason of say... ST vs. Brembo vs. WillWood.
Pro's and con's of each system. Maybe a real world example from someone who has driven or installed both or all three.
I just get too many mixed reviews...the guys with Brembo, LOVE Brembo.
The guys with ST, LOVE ST. Nobody likes WillWood.
I'm assuming that you (zeckhausen) are more in favor of the ST since you run it on your own car.
Any particular reason???
The best solution fit depends on the platform. For some platforms (e.g., BMW X5), I prefer Brembo. StopTech doesn't have coverage on many older American models, and that's where I tend to go for Baer Racing. For the 300C/Magnum RT/Charger platform, the StopTech kit is the only one that fits the stock 18" wheels. And, it is more aesthetically pleasing, since the rear kit uses the same 355x32mm rotors as the front and the caliper is the same size (albeit with smaller pistons), wheras the Brembo rear kit is much smaller than the front kit. Since I wanted to keep my stock 18" 300C wheels for winter and the stock 18" Magnum RT wheels for summer, I was constrained in my selection. If you race and go through consumables (pads, rotors, etc.) at a regular rate, StopTech is far more economical:
StopTech consumables:
http://www.zeckhausen.com/StopTech/consumables.htm
Brembo consumables:
http://www.zeckhausen.com/Brembo/Consumables.htm
For the typical street-only user, the consumable cost is less important, since pads can last 50,000 miles or more and rotors can last nearly the life of the car.
As part of the development of their front and 4-wheel brake kits, StopTech conducted extensive testing of this platform. They measured stopping distances on the stock brakes to obtain a baseline, then they measured stopping distances with front and 4-wheel big brake kits installed. These tests were conducted on the same car, same day, same test driver and at the same track. The stock Continental ContiTouring Contact tires were used.
Ten stops each were performed from 60mph, 80mph, and 100mph. Each stop was measured with a stationary radar gun, feeding data into a laptop. Accuracy of the test fixture has been confirmed to less than 2 tenths of an inch.
The average stopping distance for each of the three speeds is:
60-0 mph
- Stock: 124.50 feet
- StopTech front brake kit: 121.77 feet
- StopTech 4-wheel kit: 120.44 feet (4.06 feet better than stock)
80-0 mph
- Stock: 221.57 feet
- StopTech front brake kit: 214.22 feet
- StopTech 4-wheel kit: 211.07 feet (10.5 feet better than stock)
100-0 mph
- Stock: 343.90 feet
- StopTech front brake kit: 337.56 feet
- StopTech 4-wheel kit: 327.16 feet (16.74 feet better than stock)
For more details on the test methodology, you can check out my write-up at:
http://www.zeckhausen.com/Testing_Brakes.htm
This sort of optimization for every individual application is simply not done by other BBK manufacturers. StopTech uses appropriate caliper piston sizing to make a kit that has the optimum front/rear balance to minimize stopping distance and preserve the stock brake torque reaction to keep ABS and stability control systems happy. For any 4-piston caliper, they can choose from piston sizes of 28, 30, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, or 44mm.
Here are some shots from my installation:
Stock left front brakes
Stock front 2-piston calipers weigh 12.2 pounds each and stock 1-piece 345x28mm rotors weigh 23 pounds each.
StopTech right rear brakes (with optional zinc plating for snow country) I dont' have a shot of the left front - sorry!
The StopTech 4-piston calipers weigh 8 pounds each and the floating 355x32mm rotors weigh just 17 pounds.
Comparison of StopTech rotor to stock rear rotor