Joined
·
5 Posts
Starting at the bottom and working up:
CTS: 3.6L V6, 255 HP
300L: 3.5L V6 250 HP
CTSV: 5.7 V8, 400 HP
300C: 6.1 V8, 425 HP
I've heard allot of comments that the CTSV "feels" faster and drives better. I wonder if that trickles down the line to the standard CTS as well tho. Lord knows Cadillac is nickel and dimeing me for every tiny luxury feature, but it feels a tad classier. I love the 300 styling far more, but since I only have like 2 hours in the drivers seat (all test drives) I haven't been able to push its limits.
Anyone with real world experience, that would like to chime in and compare or contrast these cars? (i've also posted this question on a CTS forum so I can negate the biased information from both sides)
SB
CTS: 3.6L V6, 255 HP
300L: 3.5L V6 250 HP
CTSV: 5.7 V8, 400 HP
300C: 6.1 V8, 425 HP
I've heard allot of comments that the CTSV "feels" faster and drives better. I wonder if that trickles down the line to the standard CTS as well tho. Lord knows Cadillac is nickel and dimeing me for every tiny luxury feature, but it feels a tad classier. I love the 300 styling far more, but since I only have like 2 hours in the drivers seat (all test drives) I haven't been able to push its limits.
Anyone with real world experience, that would like to chime in and compare or contrast these cars? (i've also posted this question on a CTS forum so I can negate the biased information from both sides)
SB