OOPS
sorry about the mix up
here's the right link
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20050110/tc_nm/autos_show_gm_engines_dc_1
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20050110/tc_nm/autos_show_gm_engines_dc_1
Unless I'm mistaken, the vehicles GM plans to add V-8's to, are all front drivers. The engineering just doesn't work for more than 270 hp. Large V-8 = HP & Torque. Needs car with steering at front; drive wheels at rear.Tha187um said:OOPSsorry about the mix up
here's the right link
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20050110/tc_nm/autos_show_gm_engines_dc_1
Northern Rider said:Unless I'm mistaken, the vehicles GM plans to add V-8's to, are all front drivers. The engineering just doesn't work for more than 270 hp. Large V-8 = HP & Torque. Needs car with steering at front; drive wheels at rear.
Simple, but the General just doesn't get it. Or is this another band-aid solution, while they play catch-up?
Yes they did. I had an Olds Aurora with the Northstar V-8. They restricted torque and it still had torque steer. More significantly, it became unstable and unpredictable under certain braking / steering maneuvers. A scary ride at times.jjs said:Northstars were putting out 300 to the front.
Perhaps the Olds was configured differently, or had different tire/wheel selections...Northern Rider said:Yes they did. I had an Olds Aurora with the Northstar V-8. They restricted torque and it still had torque steer. More significantly, it became unstable and unpredictable under certain braking / steering maneuvers. A scary ride at times.