Joined
·
4,455 Posts
Chrysler LLC Reports June 2008 Sales; Let's Refuel America $2.99 Gas Guarantee Plus... | Reuters
Have fun with the numbers.
at:
Have fun with the numbers.
I think you mixed up lines. Magnums are the same as Crossfire which is one line above PT. Both are discontinued cars thus there is such huge percentage decline as they sell the remaining inventory of 2008.Chrysler LLC Reports June 2008 Sales; Let's Refuel America $2.99 Gas Guarantee Plus... | Reuters
Have fun with the numbers.at:
i would say we have them about in balance. i would not even call them station wagon. may be only doe to shape. the wagons of the past were huge, bulky with no handling. magnum is sharp, sporty, well mannered beast. i could see myself getting magnum at some point later as i want to get a dog the thing looks perfect for taking the friend on trips.i can't believe they killed the magnum. I see way more magnums than I do 300's and chargers, but it just must be in the area I am in. That was the best looking station wagon that has ever come out.
Chrysler LLC Reports June 2008 Sales; Let's Refuel America $2.99 Gas Guarantee Plus... | Reuters
Have fun with the numbers.at:
EVER? I would have to disagree. We used to have a PT Cruiser, and while it wasn't the best car ever, it was pretty damn versatile, and boy was it CHEAP. 27MPGish, and the interior is ENORMOUS. Throw on some roof racks and you can haul most of a mid-sized apartment. But it was uncomfortable (aftermarket seats would have helped), the ergonomics of the cabin were horrific, and the shape did absolutely NOTHING for wind noise. We had a bare-bones base model, the upper tiers may have been better.I hate the PT Cruiser. It's the most ridiculous car Chrysler has ever built.
Yeah, ever. I think your entry explained a lot, but you forgot to add how ugly :dead1: it was. IMHAHO :biggrin:EVER? I would have to disagree. We used to have a PT Cruiser, and while it wasn't the best car ever, it was pretty damn versatile, and boy was it CHEAP. 27MPGish, and the interior is ENORMOUS. Throw on some roof racks and you can haul most of a mid-sized apartment. But it was uncomfortable (aftermarket seats would have helped), the ergonomics of the cabin were horrific, and the shape did absolutely NOTHING for wind noise. We had a bare-bones base model, the upper tiers may have been better.
I'm afraid notYeah, ever. I think your entry explained a lot, but you forgot to add how ugly :dead1: it was. IMHAHO :biggrin:
I've been trying to go back as far as I could in Chrysler history, but can not find anything worse than the PT. Can you help me out?
I hate the PT Cruiser. It's the most ridiculous car Chrysler has ever built.
I guess it's all in the eye of the beholder. For me, it was the PT (and its retro look) that rekindled my interest in cars again (and a lot of us of my generation). Not only that, it's a great car to customize, just like the 300C.But it was uncomfortable (aftermarket seats would have helped), the ergonomics of the cabin were horrific, and the shape did absolutely NOTHING for wind noise. We had a bare-bones base model, the upper tiers may have been better.
I agree. The wagon was killed of prematurely. Although, if its death can help save Chrysler I'm fine with that.I'm surprised they don't build the 300c Wagon in the US. It's called the 300c Touring in the UK.
As for PT Cruisers they should all be melted down and turned back in to bean cans.