Chrysler 300C & SRT8 Forums banner

1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
534 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I now have proof that its not right. On the way home today I decided to do a 0-60 run to test it. I ran my Predator in a log also. The EVICs time; 4.58 sec. The logs time, 4.72 sec.

Now if it was two different runs I could definetly see a .14 sec difference, but this was the same run.

Log is here, http://www.scandepot.net/viewscan.php?pk=5005 if anyone is interested. I also have the original LOG and CSV files.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,129 Posts
so how do you know which one is correct?

did you do multiple runs and the EVIC was always more optimistic than the predator?

4.72 is still pretty darn good though

reason i ask is because im not sure i understand how to read your attachment...it was very long, i got bored with it..:)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
534 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
I only made two runs, and the EVIC was quicker on both by about the same. .14 on one, .16 on the other. Which one is right? Not sure, but I prefer to go with the conservative one.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,129 Posts
true, and like i said, 4.7 seconds is still darn quick.

the biggest issue with our cars is gettin them moving, once they get going, they are hard to keep up with. so sub-5 second 0-60 is a big deal.

thanks for the info
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top